It is a marvellous sentiment, wishing
others a Happy New Year and having it reciprocated. At family and friendship
levels, I expect the offering is sincere, promising new and better beginnings but
in politics, that is likely to be as far from the truth as one can get.
Despite the assurances and wishes of
politicians for a Peaceful New Year, I see no joy for the occupants of Aleppo,
nor for Syria as a whole. I hear criticisms of western governments for the
"failure" to get involved but history teaches us not to get involved
in other people's civil wars. So, plaudits for Russia and Turkey? Doubtful.
In UK, the burning issue for 2017 is bound
to be Brexit. I anticipate a dog's brexit. Leavers, Remainers and Remoaners
will not alter their views to make the New Year a happy one. Come the summer,
when British holidaymakers will feel the cost of the Euro or US Dollar in their
wallets, there will be more Remoaners. A price hike in gasoline is on the
cards, too, as oil is priced in Eurodollars.
What of America? Since early November, real
politics has been cocooned by speculation. The bar on a Trump presidency has
been lowered so much, it’s hardly visible. During the campaign, Trump made
almost 300 promises, several about what he would do on his first day in office,
such as repeal Obamacare. Quite what will happen on 20 January is anyone's
guess. I am not a fortune teller. However, it is relevant to remember that an
American President cannot make new laws. Under the Constitution, this role is
for Congress.
What of Trump's cabinet? I admit I know
almost none of those named and nothing of their qualifications nor history,
save what has been written in the press. However, Trump seems to be appointing
mostly men in his own image, people who are uber wealthy with business
backgrounds and no political experience.
It might sound positive to ask big
business to move its skills into government. However, I have no evidence that
it works. John Kennedy appointed the CEO of Ford Motors, Robert McNamara, to
lead the US Defence Department. Under his leadership, in conjunction with
President Johnson, McNamara escalated the Vietnam War, leading to a disastrous
recession for the American economy, ignominious defeat and serious social
unrest within the States.
In UK, Prime Minister Gordon Brown
elevated Alan Sugar to the House of Lords to assist and oversee small and
medium businesses. Sugar was a brilliant marketer and salesman of Amstrad
computers. Then he made a fortune in commercial property. He starred¸ equivalent
to Trump, in Britain's version of The Apprentice. How did he fare in
government? He resigned before Brown could tell him, "You're fired."
Another Gordon Brown appointment from
outside politics was Sir Ara Darzi, later Lord Darzi, who took a major role in reorganising
the NHS. He lasted longer than Sugar but his reforms have had minimal effect.
Some would argue they have been damaging in the long term.
Before any of you point the finger at me
and ask what I would have done better, it is my firm belief that politics and
policy should be left to experienced politicians and public servants who actually
know what they are doing far better than me. Certainly bring in expertise from
other sectors but put them in charge? Where is the evidence that this works.
I hope I am wrong about Trump's cabinet
but what political experience has a head of big oil when dealing with Heads of
State around the world? Political life is not an oil deal, nor does the oil
business necessarily equip someone to be effective when plunged in the murky
side of foreign policy and the deals that are needed to make the world go round.
Mind you, it could be argued that the real fear is the vested interests of
business, shaping foreign policy decisions to the advantage of big oil and the
detriment of American citizens. But I’m delving into speculation.
I wish you all a very Happy and Peaceful
New Year. For those of you who, like me, love watching the machinations of
D.C., it is going to be interesting, fascinating and probably quite scary.
No comments:
Post a Comment