For much
of this 21st century, the goings-on in Washington haven’t been
pretty. “Special Interests,” “Gridlock” and “Partisan Politics” are phrases
that are used daily in the media. However, in the past week, this most
political of cities has changed from opposition at all costs to behaving in a
way the majority of voters would probably want. It is as if Frank Capra had
taken over the running of the three branches of government. Capra, the 1930s
and 40s director of films such as “Mr Smith Goes to Washington” and “It’s a
Wonderful Life,” was a lover of the human spirit, optimism and happy endings.
So,
what happened last week? The Supreme Court in majority decisions ruled first
that Obamacare stands. The challenge by the advantaged right to expose a tiny loophole
in the legislation, which might have meant the removal of a tax break for the
poorer in society, forcing them out of the benefits of the Act, failed. Now, this
does not mean that the extremists of Republican persuasion will stop their
challenges to a law they appear to hate, nor will it mean the administration of
Obamacare will now go smoothly but SCOTUS has ensured that almost all American
citizens can continue to avail themselves of healthcare insurance, at least for
the time being.
The
Court then ruled that states could not lawfully bar gay marriage. Personally, I
don’t think this is the business of the federal government but I also do not
think that a state has the right to bar marriage between two consenting adults,
regardless of gender. So, I regard the ruling as appropriate, if not sound. I
accept the religious right and others have a case but, at the end of the day,
who is hurt by a marriage between persons of the same gender, especially if
they have lived together openly? I see no lasting damage to society.
In
recent times, there seems to have been a sea change in Congress. Readers of
this blog know I have not been a fan of Harry Reid, the former majority leader
of the Senate. For me, he was the abominable “no” man. He seems to have seen no
point in legislation. If a bill was introduced which he didn’t like, he used
his power to prevent it from coming to the floor of the Senate for a vote. He
operated on bills which he perceived the President would not want. His mantra
seemed to be, “no debate, no amendments, no vote.”
Partisanship
in the Senate has been the order of the day since the Republicans won the
Senate in the 2014 mid-terms but recently Mitch McConnell, the new majority
leader, has shown a willingness to return to traditional ways. In the Senate,
bills are now debated and voted on, especially if approved first by the House
of Representatives.
This
week the Trans-Pacific Partnership Bill will be placed before President Obama
for approval. The Bill has no details of what trading terms will be sought.
Heretofore, Mr. Obama has kept precise terms to himself, fearing opponents
within his own party would object to freer trade, which will reduce union power.
It is, however, an enabling bill, one which sets rules allowing the chief
executive to negotiate with trading partners without having Congress on his
back. Furthermore, the powers in the bill will survive the end of his
presidency. Obama’s successor will enjoy the benefits too.
What
has caused the change? One could argue for political common sense but this is a
commodity that has been in short supply in DC for many a year. Possibly, it is
just good luck for the administration but this is too simplistic.
My
belief is that politics is the prime cause. The Democratic presidential nomination
for 2016 is pretty well settled, according to most observers but the Republican
field has some twenty hopefuls and there is no clear front runner. Republicans,
generally, enjoy little popularity in the country, save for the base and the
religious right, mainly because they are perceived to be a block to progress
for anything but an extreme right wing agenda. It is the desire to enhance
their electability that drives Senator McConnell and those with similar views to
work with the White House to “get the job done.”
There
are many issues that have yet to be worked on. The government has no clear
policy or strategy on ISL, climate change and government deficits. If Congressional
Republicans are seen to be working with the Obama administration in an effort
to find acceptable solutions, this will help pave the way for the Republican
nominee to have a serious run for the White House. The irony is they, the
Republicans, are turning a “lame duck” President into one who might actually
get things done.
No comments:
Post a Comment