The responsible element in America’s media - and by this I refer to The New York Times, The Washington Post and
television stations like CBS - gives the impression that the White House is in
constant chaos, led by a man who is both capricious and undisciplined. They
portray him as a man who does not bother to study a brief, who governs on the
basis of hunches, guesses and prejudice and, it seems, hires and fires at will
without a comprehensible and consistent set of policies.
I have no idea of what it is like to work in the White House these days.
I suspect it is difficult but there’s nothing new in that. If the Boss is
unpredictable and enjoys confusion and disorder, an employee cannot do right
for doing wrong. However, what can be tested is turnover. Has there been a lot
of hiring and firing in the executive branch during the past 15 months? What
follows is a quantitative analysis.
Let’s look at the Trump cabinet:
·
Rex Tillerson, the Secretary of State, was replaced in March, 2018, by former
CIA Director, Mike Pompeo.
·
The original Attorney General and Secretaries of the Treasury, Defence,
the Interior, Agriculture, Labour (after the nomination of Andy Puzder failed),
HUD, Transportation, Energy and Education remain in post.
·
At Health and Human Services, Tom Price was replaced by Alex Azar.
·
In Veteran Affairs, Kirstjen Nielsen replaced John Kelly as Homeland
Security Secretary when he took over as Chief of Staff.
Clearly, there is no case to support a claim of an avalanche of
replacements at this level.
Have other officials at Cabinet-level suffered a different fate?
·
The Chief of Staff, Reince Priebus, was replaced by John Kelly.
·
Mike Pompeo left the CIA to take over as Secretary of State and he was
replaced by Gina Haspel.
·
The United States Trade Representative, Robert Lightizer, the Director
of National Insurance, Dan Coats, the Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki
Haley, the Director of Office of Management and Budget, Mick Mulvaney, and the
Administrator of Small Business Administration, Linda McMahon all remain in
post.
·
Deputy Chief of Staff, Katie Walsh.
·
Communications Directors, Anthony
Scaramucci, Mike Dubke and Hope Hicks.
·
Press Secretary and Communications
Director, Sean Spicer.
·
The disgraced Mike Flynn, National
Security Advisers, K. T. McFarland, Dina Powell and H R McMaster, deputy
National Security Adviser, Rich Higgins, National Security Council member,
Sebastian Gorka, adviser on national security issues.
·
Gary Cohn. Trump’s senior economic
adviser.
·
Steve Bannon, chief strategist.
·
Omarosa
Manigault Newman, Director of Communications for the White House Office of
Public Liaison.
·
Keith
Schiller, Director of Oval Office Operations.
·
Robert
Porter, Staff Secretary.
This might seem to be a long procession of senior people leaving or being
ejected from the White House. However, it is worth remembering that the West
Wing and the Old Executive Building is the work place for more than a thousand
senior employees. In America, federal government positions are usually a good
thing to have on a CV and contacts made can be helpful for future careers but
pay is considerably less than the private sector offers. I understand the
average time spent working for the federal government is less than four years.
As for the President’s conduct, his modus
expellandum might seem harsh but it was former British Prime Minister who
said a leader “had to be a good butcher.” When FDR was Governor of New York
(1928-1932), he experimented with policies in New York State to alleviate the
economic depression there. He was helped hugely by three Columbia University
professors, Raymond Moley, Rex Tugwell and Adolph Berle. All three followed FDR
to D.C and all three left the White House within a year.
Other Presidents have been involved in high-level dismissals. Truman sacked
General MacArthur for insubordination. JFK sacked CIA Director Allen Dulles
after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. And Richard Nixon took out the butcher’s knife to
remove senior advisers Haldeman, Erlichman and Dean as well as Attorney-General
Kliendienst. In the famous Saturday Night Massacre, he also fired the Watergate
Special prosecutor, Archibald Cox, as well as the three most senior members of
the Justice Department. But looking at the record of the most recent Trump
predecessors, Trump has removed more people in 15 months than Obama did in 8
years. Likewise, George W. Bush encouraged loyalty and his firings are far less
than Trump’s.
I don’t think the Trump cause is helped by some supporters. For example,
the former New Jersey governor Chris Christie acts like a sycophantic spin-man
on the President’s behalf. On ABC’s “This Week” last weekend, he said: “The
President was ill-served right from the beginning by a group of people who
threw all the transition work out, thirty-five 8-inch binders of vetting of
over 350 people, that were consistent with his views, that they got rid of,
literally threw in the garbage two or three days after the election, started
over.” Did Trump clone this man?
Trump’s behaviour has also set
the benchmark low on personal finance probity and ethics. Senior officials have
taken their cues. Health and Human Services Secretary, Tom Price, abused air
travel rules. Veterans Affairs Secretary, David Shulkin, and others followed
suit. HUD Secretary, Ben Carson, spent
$31,000 of taxpayers’ money on a dining room set. Environmental Protection
Agency Administrator, Scott Pruitt, is fighting for his job against a barrage
of allegations about issues ranging from his first-class travel to reassignment
of senior staff who criticized how he was spending taxpayer funds.
This weekend, The Washington Post reported Chief of
Staff Kelly saying, “I’m out of here, guys,” which colleagues interpreted as a
resignation threat. A senior administration official said Kelly was just
venting his anger and leaving work an hour or two early to head home. I’m
inclined to believe The Post. Kelly’s
role is the most important in the executive after the President and to resign
within a year of appointment would send out shock waves.
Since the departures from Trump’s White House are significantly greater
than other Presidencies, I have to question why. The litmus test for federal
government employment includes strong
ethics, experience, honesty and self-respect. Is there is a case to
suggest that public servants, who would otherwise be qualified, do not want to
work in this White House? Perhaps they want to avoid any fallout over the
administration’s more questionable activities.
Trump and his people assured us during the 2016 campaign that
everything would work out because stellar people would be there to help Trump. How
can they help a President who appears not to listen and who will plough his own
furrow regardless? When one looks at people of quality like Gary Cohn, a
respected official who left government because his advice on tariffs was
rejected, were the voters mistaken? For me, the answer is clear. However, it is
important to remember that every employee of the executive branch serves at the
pleasure of the President, to fire as he pleases.
No comments:
Post a Comment