Hillary on her way to Iowa |
So, after eighteen months of newsprint
sufficient to make a substantial dent in the Brazilian rainforest, not to
mention the electricity used in Tweeting, Face-booking and the like, the worst-
kept secret of American politics is finally out. Hillary Clinton has put her
hat in the ring. She is running for president.
Traditionally, candidates for the
presidential nomination go to a place meaningful to them, such as the local high
school, the steps of the state congress, where, backed by their spouse and
children, they talk of their childhoods, the importance of family, and their
desire to serve the public. Habitually, the speech ends with the words, “and so
today, I am announcing my candidacy for president of the United States of
America.”
Hillary decided to do things
differently. She announced her candidacy via social media. Twitter and Facebook
may have become the birthplace of presidency. I would love to hear Harry Truman
on the gambit. However, old Harry would have liked what Hillary did next. She
announced a road trip, neither in a Battle Bus, nor a limousine but in a
minibus. The trip would take her from DC all the way to Iowa where, in 2008,
Barack Obama gave her the first of many bloody noses.
I do not know precisely how much money
is in Mrs Clinton’s war chest but it is certain that she is well-funded through
numerous PACS and SUPERPACS. I suspect she has hundreds of millions of dollars
behind her, if not billions. Money will not be a problem for her through the
primary season. Nor will Democratic opposition. There is only nine months until
the Iowa caucus. It is difficult to envisage a Democratic candidate emerging
now who would give Hillary a serious run for her money. Elizabeth Warren is quiescent
right now.
The Republican opposition will probably
stay quiet on Hillary. What is the point of their attacking Mrs Clinton now?
Surely this should wait until she has become the Democratic nominee, at which
time the Republican presidential field will have reduced from the current
twenty or so hopefuls to less than a handful. None of the front runners for the
Republican nomination - Jeb Bush, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Scott Walker -
seem to have the Party base on high alert. Chris Christie might have been a
formidable opponent for Hillary but the Bridgegate scandal seems to have
wrecked his chances.
There are plenty of issues where
Hillary might be vulnerable. Her poor choice of ambassador to Libya and the
subsequent deaths in the diplomatic compound, the private e-mail server used by
her as Secretary of State, making her appear as if she thinks she is above the
law; allegedly questionable donations by the Clinton Foundation and untrue
claims by her about putting herself in harm’s way when Secretary of State. Her
record as Senator for New York State and voting the Bush ticket on military
action may also hurt her. Even her record as First Lady might not stand too
much scrutiny. It’s not her failure on healthcare that I’m considering, it’s
the removal of White House furniture when her husband left office.
However, Mrs Clinton has a lot going
for her. She enjoys considerable popularity at the moment, women voters are in
the majority in America and they may feel it’s time for one of their gender to
take top spot. Furthermore, she has a team of experienced and tested advisers
and aids, headed by the man to whom she is married. No American politician can
move a crowd like Bill Clinton.
Her age, at 67, might be an issue but
she is a savvy politician and will, no doubt, learn from Ronald Reagan who said
of his Democratic opponent, Fritz Mondale, “I will not criticize my opponent
for his youth and inexperience.”
So, some eighteen months from now, what
can defeat Mrs Clinton? In two words, Mrs Clinton. She has a vulnerability, a
moral compass that seems to be disturbed by an adverse magnetic power that puts
her off focus. She gives the impression she has a problem distinguishing right
from wrong. In the political world, this issue is rarely simple. But in a
contest which is all about character, Hillary will be portrayed as someone who
has not stepped up to the plate in the past.
In addition to a test of character, the
American presidential election process is a test of stamina. I have no doubt
that Mrs Clinton is up for the challenge. Will she make it to the finishing
line? Let me dust off my crystal ball…..in eighteen months.
No comments:
Post a Comment