This will be my last blog of the
year, partly as my daughters who live far away are congregating at the family home
and partly because I am frustrated by what I see in American politics. The
Senate remains the scene of a potential filibuster to pass the budget! Hopefully,
I’ll be refreshed for the New Year.
Last week, I said I would put my
head in a noose and write about religion American-style. This is a first for
me. In all the years that I have written about the American scene, I felt that
religion was the third rail, i.e. touch it and you die. However an article in
the Sunday Times of 8th December has changed my mind. Columnist
Andrew Sullivan suggested that in America, religion and politics tend to be
fused and religious doctrine is wielded as a political weapon.
Sullivan poses an interesting
argument. He suggests that the extreme right believed the Pope, thus the entire
Catholic Church, was on its side, as opinions on abortion and contraception and
its anti-communist hatred were shared with the Pontiff. Shock jocks like Rush
Limbaugh invoked Pope John Paul II as a Catholic who “had no truck with leftie
criticisms of capitalism.” However, recently, tea party followers like Sarah
Palin – remember her, she could see Russia from her bedroom – are now
questioning the ideology of the Catholic Church, suggesting it has become
liberal, thus weak. Sullivan concludes that the Pope’s message of Love needs to
be shared by materialistic Republicans and Democrats alike.
To ram the point home, in a
message this week entitled Fraternity, The Foundation and Pathway to Peace,
Pope Francis criticised injustice, human trafficking and organised crime as
deterrents to the path to peace. He attacked policies of big salaries for the
rich while the poor survive on crumbs and that governments should do more to
close the gap. Previously Pope Francis has made his views known on trickle-down
economics, financial speculation and the idea that the market knows best. He
believes all are wrong and damaging to society.
Why some Republicans would think
that the Catholic Church only supports their views is unmitigated gall. Do
these people really think there are no Democrat Catholics in America? Is it
their opinion that the Pope would support right-wing Americans who want to
impose “family values” on the rest of the country? A certain Senator from
Pennsylvania stood on this platform not long ago in a run for the Presidency.
He was soon cast aside.
Some time ago, I came across an
article in the American Sociological Review. It looked at church attendance and
found that, at least in a Chicago suburb, of those interviewed who said they
attended church weekly, only half actually did. If anyone wants chapter and
verse for the article, they have only to ask. I don’t suggest the article
proves anything except the peculiarity that a number of Americans felt too
embarrassed to tell researchers they did not attend church regularly. Was there
a political connection? Possibly peer pressure was in force.
What is my position? Simple,
religion and politics don’t mix. I learned this lesson well from the Founding
Fathers. The first amendment to the Constitution spells this out loud and
clear: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…” I
accept that religion plays a big part in American life. One has only to drive
through any number of cities and towns to see the vast numbers of churches that
are supported by the local populace. But politicising religion is a different
matter and it leads to some of the grief America is experiencing now.
May I close this blog by wishing
you a Merry Xmas, a Happy New Year and may your God go with you.
Sullivan doesn't seem to have a clue that the teachings of the (old) Catholic Church do not reflect the beliefs of many if not most practising Catholics. The catholic vote follows the beliefs and values of those catholics.
ReplyDelete